Peter Brock’s Blog

Peter Brock

Peter Brock has become a blogger!  Sometimes referred to as the Energizer Bunny, Brock continues to delight us with his designs, insights and stories.

Now you don’t have to go to an event to ask Brock a question. He will answer your questions online on his blog, which will also make the answers available for all to see.  You may want to ask questions about a project or vehicle Brock has worked on, a person he may have worked with, a design, his photography career or a question on current automotive happenings on which you would like his opinion.

Brock may not be able to get to all questions but he’ll try. Brock’s answers may be in various formats such as a text response or as video. Often Brock will have something in his archives or in the shop he will share.

Please subscribe to Peter Brock’s Blog in the box at right, to be notified of posts. If you have a question for Brock's Blog, please submit it below.

Peter Brock's Blog

Subscribe now!
Loading

Submit your question here



McLaren M8F with driver Denny Hulme The Can-Am era was a transitional point in race car design. The term “aerodynamics” as applied to racing car design can be divided into two periods: 1) low drag and 2) downforce.  Prior to the adoption of big American V8s for racing in the early Can-Am era, increases in speed were accomplished by the reduction of aerodynamic drag. The Daytona Cobra Coupe was a perfect example as the increase
Q: At the NY Auto Show this week Nissan unveiled a 50th Anniversary 370Z that paid tribute to your BRE Datsun race cars. What do you think of that?   A: I was over the moon when Nissan contacted us last year saying they wanted to pay tribute to the legacy of the BRE Datsun 240Z’s racing successes with a special limited edition 50th Anniversary Z.  We have wanted Nissan to leverage our racing history
first shelby cobra
Ak Miller No question that Carroll Shelby “invented” the Cobra sports car with the idea of installing a V8 Ford engine in an English AC Chassis, but he wasn’t the first to actually do it!  If we forget the name Cobra, which defines this question, we have to acknowledge the first man to put a Ford V8 in an AC chassis to go racing.  Famed California “Hot Rodder” Ak Miller had completed the project with
DeTomaso P70
In my book on this car, I stated I never knew why De Tomaso didn’t finish the 7-litre engine he had promised Shelby for the P70. Wonderfully, someone who read my book sent me the answer. He is absolutely correct and I thought I’d share his GREAT letter with you! Dear Mr. Brock: I just read "The Road to Modena." What an incredible book about an incredible car! Thank you for writing it and including
peter brock with clay model
The main difference was the oversight and the number of people involved. At GM I was working for Bill Mitchell the VP of corporate design with some 27 years of experience in heading several teams of designers in various studios. At Shelby’s, I was completely on my own in designing the Daytona simply because it was my idea to begin with and there was no one else in our small team of fabricators and mechanics

9 thoughts on “Back in the day of Can-Am, the McLarens ran full length aerodynamic fences nose to tail. After that time, it didn’t seem that designers used full length fences. I have always wondered why. It seems like a good way to keep the airflow on the top of the car and not spilling off. Was it a rules thing why designers stopped using them or was there an aerodynamic or stability issue?

  1. Hey Peter, It’s great to experience the revival of questions and considerations regarding the various designs and the effects thereof.

  2. Ok, but if the fences worked so well. How come they were not continued. Even in the Can-Am series you didn’t see the them except on the McLarens. Porches didn’t have them, neither did the L&M Lola. And you don’t see them on any other Sports Prototype cars. Today you see all kinds of “flow control” devices on cars. But you don’t see nose to tail fences. That’s why I was wondering if there was some issue with them. The “tunnel” F1 cars were stopped because there was stability issues and they to “flat bottom” cars that made the issues go away and worked better as well.

  3. If you want to have some fun, head down to Hillbank motors with a bunch of Chaparral photos in your hands. Then look at the Cobra 289 roadster, the Daytona coupe, the coupe and roadster version of the Corvette Grand Sport and then your photos and ask yourself, what is going on here?
    Why was the Daytona top speed faster than the Cobra roadster and the Grand Sport roadster top speed faster than the Grand Sport coupe?
    That’s just for openers. Look at the photo of the Chaparral “sucker” car and ask how come the LAP TIME of this car was so fast that McLaren got it banned from competition?
    Fun and games

    1. I have always looked to Jim Hall and Colin Chapman as the masters. The rest have just used that groundwork to improve their designs.

    1. It was a very successful design (still valid today) that only went out of favor when McLaren quit because Porsche’s 917Ks had a power advantage that put the McLarens on the trailer. The 917s didn’t use the design because with their power advantage they didn’t have to. No one else used the design because, as with the McLarens, it wouldn’t have been enough to overcome the 917K’s power. PB

  4. Along with the TransAm it was a great era and we probably will never see such good racing again. This was not the last time Porsche screwed up a good series. Thanks for the info.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *